Just starting up an old campaign of mine where I ask you all to IM me. I've met two awesome people from this, and innumerable others. Don't be shy, say hello, tell me a bit about yourself. It'll be smashing, eh wot.

My AIM screen name, for those too lazy to look to this news post's immediate bottom-left, is extremewookie.

Edit: I think you guys are missing the point. You can drop a comment, but the idea is to get an IM on AOL instant messenger. Just IM me out of the blue, I'll probably be there.

Hope you have a nice day and realize that your goals suck.

Good things will happen to you, yes?

Yes, here we go, my attempt to make this page somewhat interesting. Let's keep it short so I don't lose your attention.

Basically:
1)Tell me a song you think is horrible.
2)Nominate it via comment or personal message.

After I get a good amount of songs, I'm going to leave Youtube links to them, and you can all vote on which sounds the worst.

Go nuts.

You don't care! Neither do I!!!!

I know it's futile and arrogant to say that this will end the ongoing religious debate, but this is my final stand against militant atheists (MAs). I will link this everywhere a militant atheist lurks, and everywhere his ignorant slander is posted. I am going to write an argument as extensive and complete as humanly possible on this page, and hopefully turn more than a few MAs into respectful, respectable human beings.

The inspiration? A video on a certain obnoxious asshole's userpage advocating ignorance - in a nutshell, it questioned the necessity for religious toleration (in a not-so-elegant manner, I might add). Of course, the Youtube vid page played host to a war of words between MAs and the religious, and it truly pains me to see such unnecessary, narrow-minded argumentation. Perhaps I'm not the most qualified person to write on this, but I'll be damned before I sit back and let ignorance become a virtue.

I don't know how long it's going to take to write this, and chances are you don't even care, but I'm going to write it anyway. It will most likely take weeks, seeing as I am very busy this time of year, but I'm going to write it. Stay tuned.

SHAMELESS MINICITY ADVERT!!! CLICK OR DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(please)
E.Wookietown
It's in New Zealand. No one knows why.

Disclaimer: Bear with me, I know that no one is constantly buzzing my userpage from updates from their overlord Extremewookie. I just thought I could make it a bit more entertaining for NG users who happen to view it.

Okay. Got a sig and a user header, I'll quit bitching about them now. I was thinking that because I read so much that I could write a few reviews for some bestsellers out there - you know, to appeal to the five users out there who read.

In addition, I'm not going to give up on the debate club idea. Please support and shove your opinion up everyone's ass: Gay Marriage Debate: Read the rules and drop a PRO or a CON

Back to that review idea. I don't have much of an inclination to write a review right now, but fortunately I have one I wrote for an English assignment here for you. I was limited to two hundred words (I happened to hit two hundred right on the dime), so I didn't have much room to express my true feelings, and you'll probably pick up on this in the reading. What I'm essentially trying to say is that I don't normally write this poorly. Nonetheless, please enjoy this review of

The Atlantis Prophecy
by Thomas Greanias

The Atlantis Prophecy by Thomas Greanias is a fictitious novel that takes place in the modern United States. The story focuses on Conrad Yeats, who must uncover the mystery behind the strange markings on his father's tombstone. These markings take him on a race against time, a mysterious cult called "The Alignment," and an evil billionaire named Max Seavers.
Greanias boasts an intelligent and exciting writing style that makes this book a real page turner, though you can easily tell there's absolutely no substance in the plot. Though the book is exciting and would certainly appeal to any adolescent in want of a quick thrill, anyone who does read it will find themselves marveling at the numerous flaws in the plot.
Another interesting facet of the book is that it is a three hundred sixty seven page advertisement. Though Greanias was attempting to make the book feel more plausible by mentioning various commonly known products, his references only serve to irritate: "Conrad listened to the soft strains of Mozart on his iPhone's earbuds."
In closing, this won't be remembered as a classic work of literature. Thomas Greanias' best seller is a good quick thrill, but has no substance to it.

And it doesn't suck for once.

EDIT: Neat, banner's working. It may not looks like much, but that guy on the right submitted me to some of the most MS Painting I've ever done, because of separate background colors. I don't think it came out that bad at all, and I'm going to work on a new profile pic so I don't have to use that old google images one.

Thanks for viewing the page, please give me feedback on my new efforts to improve it. They may not looks like much, but I really did put a lot of time into them, so it would be great to hear from you. Unless you're a complete dick, in which case just go away.

What are you going to get me?!

:3

Oh, and I finally got an iPod, to whom it may concern. It's a black 80 gig classic, and I've never had such an adorable little gadget in my entire life.

Another happy fun birthday surprise, the people at the Transformers message board want to wish me a happy birthday. I don't actually remember signing up for said message board, though. Here's a pic, not that any of you care.

HUR HUR HUR

Just as an experiment, I'm going to try and kick off a Newgrounds debate. Hopefully, I can get some decent responses and this will emerge as an epic war of words.

Here's how it goes. I'll make a topic (America needs to abolish the penny) and you present various pros and cons on the issue, depending on your stance. A pro or con will earn your team a point, and the team with the most points will take the lead. Points can, however, be nullified by showing sufficient logic to disprove a claim. I'll be the judge of if the attempt to disprove a point is valid, and while I think the process of logic will be fairly similar and straightforward with most people, feel free to challenge my judgment call.

Oh, btw, please designate your statement either as a "Point" or "Nullification," and if you are nullifying something, please give the username whose point you are arguing against.

If you're not going to post something helpful, don't even bother, because I'm just going to delete it. Thanks for reading this and [hopefully] taking part.

Current topic: Gay marriage

Pros:

Cons:

-"Don't allow it. It would be awkward to see gay couples in public. Who would go to those weddings anyway?" -ngfan14

-"there shouldnt be gay marriage theres just some thing weird in that thing" -Jonathan555

Current leader: Cons